Rendered from review/BRIEF-CORRECTIONS.md, which is the source of truth and the markdown twin of this page. Rendered at site v0.1.1.

Corrections to the review brief, for this repository

customers.riskmandate.ai · started at v0.1.0 (2026-10-20) · CC BY 4.0

The review brief is Code review graphs in the repository, on sgit.ai. Where this repository does not follow it, the entry is here, dated, with the reason.

R1. Only the intent half exists at v0.1.0 (2026-10-20)

The brief asks a new repository to build the whole folder before its first source file. This repository built the intent half (stories, rules, examples, anchored to the brief and the memo), a validator and a static rendering, and shipped the site. The derived half, the join, the change files, the web-component navigator and self/ are proposed, recorded in data/reality.json as site.review-derived. Reason: the site had to exist on the day the brief was accepted; a review folder for a site that does not exist reviews nothing. The next change starts the derived half, delta first.

R2. The brief's headings are not numbered (2026-10-20)

The review brief's sections.json keys sections by number. The newsroom article that is this site's brief has prose headings with no numbers, so tools/sections.py keys them by the heading's slug, which is also the anchor on the rendered page. The memo document is anchored the same way, and both are in one sections.json under docs.

R3. The navigator is a page, not components (2026-10-20)

The brief asks for a navigator built as web components in the coding.sgit.ai shape. review/index.html is a static page rendered by tools/render.py, with the same links a navigator would have (every node to its section of the brief and to the page it lands on), and no script. The components come with the derived half.